Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-10-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 319 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is much better than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, having a overall score of 84.7 against 74.6. The Galaxy A32 design is incredibly newer and a bit thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact's, although it is heavier. Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A32. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
The Xperia XZ1 Compact has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower 720 x 1280 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A32 counts with just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A32 counts with a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.