Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is way better than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, getting a global score of 91.8 against 74.6. The Galaxy A71 5G is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, but it is notably heavier. The Galaxy A71 5G has a little more vivid display than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite greater display density and a lot larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a processing unit that is just as good as the processor in Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has more RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A71 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.