Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Xperia XZ1 Compact's score of 74.6. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is way heavier than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, it's notably thinner and also extremely newer. The Xperia XZ1 Compact counts with a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a really larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a much larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures, a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory to install applications and games than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery performance than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.