Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, with a 78.8 score against 74.6. Even though vivo X60 Pro is way heavier than the Xperia XZ1 Compact, it's somewhat thinner and much newer. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a way larger screen, a just a little better pixels density and a way better 1080 x 2376 resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better performance than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro features a much better camera than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Vivo X60 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.