Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-19 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is better than Sony Xperia XZ1's general score of 78.3. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer device than Sony Xperia XZ1, but it is way heavier and thicker. Xperia XZ1 has a slightly better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen pixel density.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM. LG V60 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more internal storage capacity.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 has a little bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a way less megapixels back-facing camera, a smaller aperture, a lot tinier sensor providing a lot lower image quality and a lot lower (4K) video resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ1, because it has an 85% bigger battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.