Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ1 is a bit better than the Moto G Power, having a 78.3 score against 76.1. The Sony Xperia XZ1 body is thinner and noticeably lighter than the Moto G Power, even though it was released 3 years before. The Sony Xperia XZ1 features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Power. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Xperia XZ1 has a slightly better screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. Xperia XZ1 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Moto G Power, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xperia XZ1 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a superior battery performance than Xperia XZ1, because it has an 85 percent larger battery capacity. The Xperia XZ1 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xperia XZ1 also counts with a larger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Although Sony Xperia XZ1 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Sony Xperia XZ1, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto G Power, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.