Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2017-09-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than the Xperia XZ1, having a overall score of 90.7 against 78.3. Galaxy A52's construction is a lot newer than the Xperia XZ1's, but it is thicker and heavier. The Sony Xperia XZ1 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixel density.
The Xperia XZ1 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A52 has just a bit more memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ1, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much better videos and photos than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures, a larger camera aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better battery life than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.