Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-19 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is better than Xperia XZ1's score of 78.3. Galaxy F62's construction is incredibly newer than Xperia XZ1's, although it's notably thicker and incredibly heavier. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid screen than Xperia XZ1, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen.
Xperia XZ1 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (although slower). The Galaxy F62 features a better camera than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy F62 has a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ1, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.