Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-19 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than the Xperia XZ1's 78.3 score. Galaxy Fold's body is incredibly newer and a little thinner, but extremely heavier than Xperia XZ1. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xperia XZ1 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixels density. Sony Xperia XZ1 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Sony Xperia XZ1 also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP and a larger camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features much more memory for applications and games than Xperia XZ1, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery performance than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Galaxy Fold costs a lot more money than the Xperia XZ1, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.