Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2017-09-19 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than Xperia XZ1, getting an 86.3 score against 78.3. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is newer and just a bit lighter than the Xperia XZ1's, but it is a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little more vivid screen than Xperia XZ1, because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution, a just a little higher pixel number per display inch and a little larger display.
Xperia XZ1 counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10e, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xperia XZ1 captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in low-light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Xperia XZ1 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a bigger sensor.
Galaxy S10e counts with improved battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.