Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Sony Xperia XZ1, having a global score of 98 against 78.3. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is much newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than Sony Xperia XZ1. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a much larger screen, a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better camera than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much better 108 megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ1, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a really longer battery life than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than the Sony Xperia XZ1, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.