Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZ1's 78.3 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a notably newer and a little thinner phone than the Xperia XZ1, but it's heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit faster processor than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little more vivid screen than Xperia XZ1, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a quite greater pixels number per inch in the display and a larger screen. Xperia XZ1 shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xperia XZ1 features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a lot more money than Xperia XZ1, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.