Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-19 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xperia XZ1, with a 92.3 score against 78.3. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ1, it's just a little bit thinner and way newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Xperia XZ1, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, a larger display and a little better display density.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. The Sony Xperia XZ1 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia XZ1 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Xperia XZ1.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.