Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 general score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The LG V50 ThinQ is a newer and a lot thinner device than Xperia XZ2 Compact, but it's a little heavier.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a lot smaller display. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot more megapixels camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.