Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a score of 79 against 76.4. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, giving some extra features and a performance increase. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact design is way newer and just a bit lighter, but just a bit thicker than Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little sharper display than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a quite higher display density, a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a little larger screen. Motorola Droid Turbo's processor is very similar to the CPU in Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has a lower number of slower cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much greater memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lesser megapixels resolution back facing camera, they both have the same aperture.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with greater battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.