Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a general score of 79, which is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's general score of 77.9. Xperia XZ2 Compact is a extremely newer and just a little lighter device than the Motorola DROID Turbo, although it is also a little bit thicker. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4, offering some extra features.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little sharper display than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a just a bit higher display pixel density and a little bigger display. Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much greater memory for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 400 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a CPU that's very similar to Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's processing unit, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a lower number of slower cores and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo features improved battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a worse 19 mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.