Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's general score of 79. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola Edge 50's body is extremely newer and much thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is also just a bit heavier.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better looking display than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a little worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a higher 1220 x 2712 resolution, a way larger screen and a really brighter display.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 has a little bit better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a bigger aperture, a way more megapixels camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.