Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 483 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, with an 84.7 score against 79. Galaxy A32's design is extremely newer and a lot thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact. Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a lot better pixels number per display inch.
Galaxy A32 counts with a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 has a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy A32 features a much longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.