Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is slightly better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a global score of 82.3 against 79. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A60's design has the same weight than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, but it's much thinner.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2160px resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. Xperia XZ2 Compact features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Xperia XZ2 Compact captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a bigger sensor, a camera in the back with a better 19 mega-pixels resolution and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy A60 features just a little better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.