Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, having an 84.9 score against 79. Although the Galaxy A80 is way heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's extremely thinner and newer. Xperia XZ2 Compact features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy A80 counts with superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3700mAh battery size. Galaxy A80 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality photos and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.