Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a global score of 79, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. The Xperia XZ2 Compact is an extremely older and noticeably thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Sony made it way lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, offering a couple nice extra features.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more vivid display than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a little bit inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a really bigger display and way more brightness.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 2870mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a camera with lot more MP, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video, a much bigger camera sensor and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.