Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a global score of 79, which is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro's overall score of 78.8. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11. Xperia XZ2 Compact is a noticeably older and notably thicker cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro, but Sony managed to make it a little lighter anyway.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels per display inch.
Vivo X60 Pro takes better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X60 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.