Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a general score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is extremely newer than Motorola Droid Turbo, it is a bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and 3 GB more RAM.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a much better 2160 x 3840 resolution, a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit bigger display. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 3540mAh. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera in the back and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
Although Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Xperia XZ2 Premium, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.