Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a score of 82.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. The Xperia XZ2 Premium body is newer, but incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840px, a better pixels count in each inch of screen and a bit larger screen.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more CPU cores and more RAM.
Xperia XZ2 Premium shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations. The Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.