Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-07-30 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 760 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, getting an 84.7 score against 82.2. Galaxy A32's design is noticeably newer, noticeably thinner and lighter than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a lot better count of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 has a much better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3540mAh. The Galaxy A32 has a little bit better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a way higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.