Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a general score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Although Xperia XZ2 Premium is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it must be noted that it is also a way older, extremely thicker and just a little bit heavier device. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has a lot lower pixels quantity per display inch and a little bit lower 2200 x 2480 resolution, it also counts with much more display brightness and a really larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more memory for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture, a much better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.