Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than Xperia XZ2, having a global score of 87.1 against 79.1. The LG Velvet is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and much thinner than Xperia XZ2. The Xperia XZ2 features a bit superior processor than LG Velvet, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Xperia XZ2 features a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. LG Velvet captures clearer photographs and videos than Xperia XZ2, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
LG Velvet has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ2, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with longer battery life than Xperia XZ2, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.