Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 has a general score of 79.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 score. Even though the Sony Xperia XZ2 is notably older and somewhat thicker than the Moto G Power, it's construction is still just a little lighter. Xperia XZ2 has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density. The Xperia XZ2 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZ2 also counts with a higher 19 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Power has a very superior battery performance than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 57% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.