Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-04-05 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 is a bit better than Moto Z3, getting a score of 79.1 against 77.6. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Xperia XZ2 is an extremely thicker and notably heavier cellphone than Moto Z3. The Xperia XZ2 has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, the Xperia XZ2 also counts with a little better pixels amount in each screen inch.
Sony Xperia XZ2 features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z3. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. Moto Z3 features a superior storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z3 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Xperia XZ2 has a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Xperia XZ2 also has a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a camera with lot more MP and faster video frame rates. Sony Xperia XZ2 counts with just a little better battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 6 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.