Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 424 pixels per inch | -- |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is a bit better than the Xperia XZ2's general score of 79.1. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is noticeably newer and way thinner than the Xperia XZ2's, but it's just a little heavier. Xperia XZ2 has a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display and way less brightness.
The Xperia XZ2 counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better photographs and videos than Xperia XZ2, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.