Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | -- |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ2 is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a score of 79.1 against 77. Even being the best in this review, the Sony Xperia XZ2 body is heavier and incredibly thicker than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little faster CPU than Xperia XZ2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a screen that is just as good as Xperia XZ2's display, because although the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a quite worse pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little brighter display, a little bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xperia XZ2 features a really longer battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.