Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2, getting a score of 86.6 against 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a newer phone, and it's also extremely thinner and somewhat lighter than the Sony Xperia XZ2. The Sony Xperia XZ2 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite better screen density.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A50s, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy A50s takes a bit better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A50s counts with improved battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.