Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ2, getting a 91.1 score against 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52s design is extremely newer, a bit lighter and thinner than Sony Xperia XZ2. The Xperia XZ2 features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xperia XZ2 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a quite greater display pixels density. Galaxy A52s takes much clearer photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much bigger sensor, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy A52s has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Xperia XZ2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A52s has a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.