Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 is slightly better than the Galaxy A70, with a 79.1 score against 76.9. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Xperia XZ2 is an older, a bit heavier and way thicker device than Galaxy A70. The Sony Xperia XZ2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel number per inch in the display.
Xperia XZ2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia XZ2, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3180mAh. The Xperia XZ2 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ2 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.