Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than the Xperia XZ2, having a score of 88.1 against 79.1. The Galaxy F62 design is a lot newer and thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the Xperia XZ2. The Xperia XZ2 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Xperia XZ2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with way more brightness and a little bit greater display density. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy F62 features a way better battery performance than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 120% bigger battery size. Galaxy F62 takes much better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.