Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than the Xperia XZ2's general score of 79.1. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is heavier than the Xperia XZ2, it's a lot thinner and newer. The Xperia XZ2 features a bit better screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a bit smaller screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2160 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better processing power than Xperia XZ2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3180mAh. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Xperia XZ2, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger camera sensor, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.