Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZ2, getting a score of 80.1 against 79.1. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a noticeably newer cellphone than Sony Xperia XZ2, although it's a lot heavier and extremely thicker. Xperia XZ2 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better looking display than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel count per inch of screen. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit more memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ2, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Xperia XZ2 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better battery life than Xperia XZ2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.