Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Xperia XZ2, with an 88.5 score against 79.1. The Galaxy Z Flip is a newer phone, and it is also a little lighter and incredibly thinner than Xperia XZ2. The Sony Xperia XZ2 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, a little less pixels per inch of display and a bit smaller display.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bigger storage for applications and games than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster CPU than Xperia XZ2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior battery life than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3180mAh. Xperia XZ2 takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xperia XZ2 also counts with a lot more MP camera and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.