Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is slightly better than the Xperia XZ2, with an 85.6 score against 79.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a a lot newer device, and it is also just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Xperia XZ2. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit superior CPU than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory.
Xperia XZ2 has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a little worse pixel count in each screen inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution. Sony Xperia XZ2 features a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 400 GB.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3180mAh. The Sony Xperia XZ2 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, it also counts with a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.