Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than Xperia XZ2's global score of 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a lot newer phone, and it's also thinner and just a little lighter than Xperia XZ2. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Xperia XZ2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xperia XZ2 counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution. Xperia XZ2 takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Xperia XZ2 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with a lot higher 19 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.