Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2's 79.1 global score. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is notably heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2, it's a lot thinner and extremely newer. The Sony Xperia XZ2 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2160px resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better processing unit than Xperia XZ2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 38 percent more battery capacity. The Xperia XZ2 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.