Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2018-10-17 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than Xperia XZ3, getting an 88.1 score against 79.6. Although the iPhone X is older than Xperia XZ3, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and notably thinner. Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone X, because although it has less bright screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density, a little larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
Apple iPhone X has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Apple iPhone X features a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Xperia XZ3 has a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in low light situations and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Xperia XZ3 has superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has 3330mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
The Apple iPhone X costs more than Xperia XZ3, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.