Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than the Xperia XZ3, having a overall score of 87.5 against 79.6. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a extremely newer phone, and it is also thinner and somewhat lighter than Xperia XZ3.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xperia XZ3 features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Xperia XZ3 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Sony Xperia XZ3 has more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.