Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2018-10-17 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Xperia XZ3's overall score of 79.6. Even though LG V35 ThinQ and Xperia XZ3 were released only a couple months apart, LG V35 ThinQ is lighter and noticeably thinner. The Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a little sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ. Both have a same size screen, exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2880px and the same screen pixels density.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xperia XZ3 takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V35 ThinQ's battery life is just as good as the battery life in Xperia XZ3, although the LG V35 ThinQ has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3330mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V35 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.