Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZ3, having a global score of 86.2 against 79.6. Although Moto G200 5G is a little heavier than Sony Xperia XZ3, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version while Sony Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xperia XZ3 features a much better display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with just a little better performance than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also has a much better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture for better captures in low-light environments.
Xperia XZ3 features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G200 5G has a way better battery performance than Xperia XZ3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3330mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.