Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is slightly better than Xperia XZ3, having a global score of 82 against 79.6. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only body is way newer, somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than the Xperia XZ3. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 11 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xperia XZ3 has a little faster processor than Galaxy A32 LTE Only. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores. The Sony Xperia XZ3 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a quite smaller display and much lower brightness, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ3, because although it has a lot smaller sensor providing a way worse image quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a larger camera aperture and a back facing camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a much better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3330mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.