Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-17 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is a bit better than Xperia XZ3's 79.6 overall score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy A50s's design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xperia XZ3.
Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The Xperia XZ3 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots much better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a much better resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3330mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.