Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is better than Xperia XZ3, getting a general score of 90.8 against 79.6. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xperia XZ3. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xperia XZ3 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xperia XZ3 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater display density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G shoots better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F2 camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G features superior battery life than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.