Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2018-10-17 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Xperia XZ3's general score of 79.6. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a extremely newer phone, and it is also a bit lighter and thinner than Xperia XZ3. The Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a much better 64 MP resolution back camera, a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Galaxy A52 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 features superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.