Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than Xperia XZ3's general score of 79.6. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is incredibly newer, a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Xperia XZ3.
Xperia XZ3 features a better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Xperia XZ3 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A52 5G features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ3, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G captures better photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video, a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features better battery performance than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.